United States v. M/V Mandan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a “breach of a fiduciary obligation is a tort claim, and thus requires the showing of a duty, a breach, an injury, and causation.”
• “Torsiello’s claims, in part, revolve around the [d]efendants’ not having made contributions to his 401(k) plan. Thus, his right to recovery is intertwined ‘with the interpretation and application of ERISA-protected benefits and is therefore completely preempted by ERISA.’”
• “Under New Jersey law, to be judicially protected, misappropriated information need not rise to the level of the usual trade secret, and indeed, may otherwise be publicly available.” (quoting Platinum Mgmt., Inc. v. Dahms, 666 A.2d 1028, 1038 (N.J. Sup. Ct. Law Div. 1995))
• dismissing privacy claim based on an intrusion into employee’s locker
• dismissing privacy claim based on an intrusion into employee's locker

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).