United States v. Murphy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \Future expectation of ownership by a child is insufficient to give a child standing to contest forfeiture.\
• “Future expectation of ownership by a child is insufficient to give a child standing to contest forfeiture.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. All Assets Held in Account No. XXXXXXXX, in the Name of Doraville Props. Corp.
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-03-05· cited 11×
• United States v. All Assets Held in Account Number 80020796, in the Name of Doraville Properties Corporation, at Deutsche Bank International, Limited in Jersey, Channel Islands, and All Interest, Benefits or Assets Tr
  District of Columbia· 2018-03-05
• United States v. Nunez
  D. Vermont· 1996-05-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Santoro
  Fourth Circuit· 1989-01-31· cited 127×
• United States v. One Rural Lot
  D. Puerto Rico· 1990-06-19· cited 16×
• United States v. Parcel of Real Property Known as 6109 Grubb Road
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-03-14· cited 14×
• Frambach v. Dunihue
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-08-25· cited 8×
• United States v. One Parcel of Real Estate at 3229 S.W. 23rd Street, Miami Florida
  S.D. Florida· 1991-06-26· cited 6×