Supreme Court· 11/23/1931
United States v. Murdock
Citations
- 284 U.S. 141
- 52 S. Ct. 63
- 76 L. Ed. 210
- 1931 U.S. LEXIS 464
- 82 A.L.R. 1376
- 10 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 465
- 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The principle established is that full and complete immunity against prosecution by the government compelling the witness to answer is equivalent to the protection furnished by the rule against compulsory self-incrimination.”
- \The principle established is that full and complete immunity against prosecution by the government compelling the witness to answer is equivalent to the protection furnished by the rule against compulsory self-incrimination.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Butler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
176 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 1,569×
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court· 1964-06-15· cited 1,503×
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court· 1958-06-16· cited 1,195×
- Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-04-16· cited 898×
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-05-15· cited 855×
- United States v. MurdockSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 721×
- Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-23· cited 531×
- United States v. MandujanoSupreme Court· 1976-05-19· cited 525×
- Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 481×
- United States v. SissonSupreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 388×
- Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1954-03-15· cited 357×
- Quinn v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-05-23· cited 357×
- United States v. John Cardillo, Lawrence Harris, Ralph Kaminsky, John Knapp, Louis Margolis, and Louis PiselliSecond Circuit· 1963-04-24· cited 261×
- Feldman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1944-10-09· cited 239×
- Reina v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-12-19· cited 206×
- United States v. CovingtonSupreme Court· 1969-05-19· cited 193×
- United States v. BalsysSupreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 174×
- Falsone v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1953-06-26· cited 169×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 1,118×
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1896-03-23· cited 849×
- United States v. OppenheimerSupreme Court· 1916-12-04· cited 417×
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court· 1927-01-03· cited 378×
- United States v. ReidSupreme Court· 1852-02-18· cited 200×
- United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1920-03-01· cited 169×
- Jack v. KansasSupreme Court· 1905-11-27· cited 95×
- United States v. GoldmanSupreme Court· 1928-05-14· cited 65×
- Jones v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1908-05-04· cited 44×
- United States v. BarberSupreme Court· 1911-01-03· cited 42×
- United States v. StorrsSupreme Court· 1926-12-13· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.