United States v. Mundell Cooper, United States of America v. Lawrence Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prison inmate was not in custody for Miranda purposes because his freedom of movement was not restricted more than it would normally be in the prison environment
• holding that prison inmate was not in custody for Miranda purposes because his free-do n of movement was not restricted more than it would normally be in the pr son environment
• removing inmate from cell to more open room deemed “inherently less restrictive”
• same, with regard to the defendant’s incriminating statements to a D.C. corrections officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).