· 12/9/1795
United States v. Mundell
Citations
- 27 F. Cas. 23
- 1 Hughes 415
- 6 Call 245
- 6 Va. 245
- 1795 U.S. App. LEXIS 54
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “proceedings that satisfy the ordinary definition of ‘appeal’ were [defendant’s] direct appeal to the Third Circuit and the certiorari proceedings in the United States Supreme Court”
- addressing a waived issue “on the merits in order to provide . . . guidance going forward”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Iredell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.