Skip to main content
· 12/9/1795

United States v. Mundell

Citations

  • 27 F. Cas. 23
  • 1 Hughes 415
  • 6 Call 245
  • 6 Va. 245
  • 1795 U.S. App. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “proceedings that satisfy the ordinary definition of ‘appeal’ were [defendant’s] direct appeal to the Third Circuit and the certiorari proceedings in the United States Supreme Court”
  • addressing a waived issue “on the merits in order to provide . . . guidance going forward”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Iredell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.