United States v. Mulvaney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rules that purport to “govern the conduct of hearings and proceedings before the Board” cannot be construed to provide three-day extension of time to file petition for writ of review of Board decision with Superior Court
• “[A] rebuttable presumption exists that the date listed on the face of an administrative agency decision is the same date that service was effectuated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).