Eighth Circuit· 2/17/2011

United States v. Muhlenbruch

Citations

634 F.3d 987
84 Fed. R. Serv. 960
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3155
2011 WL 536493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a district court did not abuse its discretion under Rule 403 when it permitted the government to play a defendant’s videotaped confession
concluding that proof of receiving child pornography necessarily includes proof of possession of child pornography and that “Congress did not intend to impose multiplieitous punishment for these offenses”
explaining that evidence is unduly prejudicial if, for example, it suggests a decision on an improper basis
deciding a confession resulting from a twenty-two minute interview “at the police station” was voluntary where the suspect was in his late thirties, had prior experience with police questioning, and was “a relatively intelligent individual”
finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court by allowing the jury to review a videotaped confession in open court
finding a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause where defendant’s convictions for both possession and receipt of child pornography were based on the same conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bye, Beam, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.