United States v. Muhannad Musa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 11(c)(1) was satisfied, although judge did not specifically state the elements of the crime, because defendant admitted to participation in drug transactions with other members of conspiracy and stated that he understood the charge
• determining that the government's proffered facts and the defendant's admissions during his plea allocution were sufficient to support a plea to conspiracy to distribute cocaine, despite the defendant's disputes with the quantity distributed and his role in the distribution activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).