United States v. M.P.M., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude that a[ ] defendant need not be required to show that reorganization prospects under the bankruptcy act were dim or nonexistent in order to discharge its burden of proof as to the ‘failing company’ defense.”
• “We conclude that a[ ] defendant need not be required to show that reorganization prospects under the bankruptcy act were dim or nonexistent in order to discharge its burden of proof as to the ‘failing company’ defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).