United States v. Mota-Santana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he two [analyses] merge, since defendant and his family ran out of funds to retain other private counsel and defendant sought court appointed counsel.”
• “[T]he two [analyses] merge, since defendant and his family ran out of funds to retain other private counsel and defendant sought court appointed counsel.”
• “[T]he two [analyses] merge, since defendant and his family ran out of funds to retain other private counsel and defendant sought court appointed counsel.”
• \The existing body of law subjecting conflict of interest issues to the most scrupulous attention is based on the principle that a person cannot faithfully serve two masters with conflicting interests.\
• defendant seeking to replace retained counsel with appointed counsel must show good cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).