United States v. Morgan, Jeffrey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the District of Columbia was an improper venue when the facts required venue in Maryland
• “[R]eceipt of stolen property . . . is not an ‘offense involving’ transportation in interstate commerce, for it does not require any such transportation for the commission of the offense.”
• “[R]eceipt of stolen property . . . is not an ‘offense involving’ transportation in interstate commerce, for it does not require any such transportation for the commission of the offense.”
• “In performing [the venue] inquiry, a court[] must initially identify the conduct constituting the offense (the nature of the crime) and then discern the location of the commission of the criminal acts.” (quoting United States v. Rodriguez-Moreno, 526 U.S. 275, 279 (1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).