United States v. Moore
Citations
- 129 F. 159
- 1904 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 292
Syllabus
<p>1. Post Office — Nonmailable Matter — Obscene Letter — Statutes—Construction.</p> <p>Rev. St. U. S. § 3893 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2658], provides that every obscene, lewd, or lascivious book, pamphlet, writing, or other publication of an indecent character shall be nonmailable. Held, that where the necessary inference from the language used in a letter was obscene, and tended to offend the sense of decency, purity, and chastity of society, it was immaterial that the words used were not themselves obscene.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>A letter was written by a married man to a married woman, not his wife, whom he had never met, suggesting that he hoped the same would come to her as “a ray of sunshine on a cloudy day”; that his attention had been called to her “by a friend of ours,” and asked her to meet him on an afternoon at the house of an old lady who kept rooms to rent “for such meetings”; that his proposition was “all straight goods,” and that he would be “a good friend” to her, and, though he had never been at such proposed meeting place, he knew others who had been there, and had been informed by them that it was “all O. K.” Held, that the purpose of such letter was an invitation and solicitation to the addressee to meet the writer for illicit intercourse, and was therefore obscene, within Rev. St. U. S. § 3893 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 2658], prohibiting the sending of any obscene writing through the mails.</p> <p>If 1. Obscene matter as nonmailable, see note to Timmons v. United States, 30 C. C. A. 79.</p> <p>See Post Office, vol. 40, Cent. Dig. § 50.</p>
Judges: Philips
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Parmelee v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1940-05-14· cited 70×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1922-09-15· cited 17×
- City of St. Louis v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri· 1910-03-15· cited 16×
- McGrew v. City of Jackson, MississippiS.D. Mississippi· 1969-12-31· cited 15×
- United States v. DavidsonN.D. New York· 1917-08-30· cited 13×
- United States v. MusgraveE.D. Arkansas· 1908-04-01· cited 11×
- Parish v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1917-11-17· cited 6×
- Krause v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1928-11-08· cited 5×
- Lau Fook Kau v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1929-07-29· cited 4×
- Sales v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1919-04-28· cited 3×
- United States v. VegaD. Puerto Rico· 1908-03-27· cited 1×
- United States v. WatsonW.D. Missouri· 1968-12-10
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.