Fourth Circuit· 8/6/2007
United States v. Mooney
Citations
- 497 F.3d 397
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18619
- 2007 WL 2231164
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an attorney performed deficiently when he advised a defendant to plead guilty but, because of a failure to conduct reasonable legal research, did not advise the defendant of a plausible affirmative defense
- construing the affirmative justification defense very narrowly when it comes to felon in possession of firearm cases
- emphasizing * Lewis’ cousin was killed in the altercation. 3 that “we . . . construe the justification defense for possession of a firearm by a felon very narrowly” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- finding the justification defense to be potentially available 5 where the defendant took the weapon from a third party with known violent tendencies who 6 allegedly put a loaded firearm to the defendant’s head
- found a justification defense exists under predecessor statute to 18 U.S.C. § 922
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Niemeyer, Gregory, Norton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. NicholsonFourth Circuit· 2010-07-12· cited 98×
- Government of the Virgin Islands v. LewisThird Circuit· 2010-09-08· cited 88×
- United States v. WhiteSecond Circuit· 2009-01-09· cited 47×
- United States v. RicksFourth Circuit· 2009-07-20· cited 26×
- Mooney v. FrazierWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2010-04-01· cited 19×
- United States v. GoreFourth Circuit· 2010-01-12· cited 18×
- United States v. AlstonThird Circuit· 2008-05-20· cited 18×
- United States v. Jafari MooreSixth Circuit· 2013-10-23· cited 6×
- Gilliard v. GruenbergDistrict of Columbia· 2018-03-26
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-11-16
- United States v. Ronald ContrerasFourth Circuit· 2025-08-14
- United States v. Pablo Velasco BarreraFourth Circuit· 2025-08-14
- United States v. Henry MartinezFourth Circuit· 2025-08-14
- United States v. Elmer MartinezFourth Circuit· 2025-08-14
- United States v. Duglas FerreraFourth Circuit· 2025-08-14
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court· 1985-11-18· cited 11,299×
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court· 1970-05-04· cited 5,113×
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1977-06-17· cited 2,751×
- United States v. BaileySupreme Court· 1980-01-21· cited 1,333×
- Dixon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 406×
- Barrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-01-13· cited 306×
- United States v. Arthur Ronald Crittendon A/K/A Jabbar Muwakkil RagibFourth Circuit· 1989-08-29· cited 237×
- Small v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2005-04-26· cited 191×
- United States v. DeleveauxEleventh Circuit· 2000-03-09· cited 172×
- Alfred Coles v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryFourth Circuit· 1968-01-08· cited 169×
- United States v. Charles Odell PerrinFourth Circuit· 1995-01-31· cited 140×
- United States v. Leonard D. SingletonSixth Circuit· 1990-05-03· cited 115×
- United States v. Anthony J. Paolello Anthony J. PaolelloThird Circuit· 1991-12-04· cited 96×
- United States v. Lester Giles PanterFifth Circuit· 1982-09-16· cited 95×
- United States v. Reginald DoddThird Circuit· 2000-08-24· cited 85×
- United States v. LeahyFirst Circuit· 2007-01-19· cited 72×
- Larry Donnell Becton v. Talmadge Barnett Attorney General of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 1990-12-26· cited 58×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Steven Paul GOMEZ, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1996-07-26· cited 55×
- United States v. Alphonso Buster Gilbert, Sr.Fourth Circuit· 2005-11-28· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.