Skip to main content
Fourth Circuit· 8/6/2007

United States v. Mooney

Citations

  • 497 F.3d 397
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 18619
  • 2007 WL 2231164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an attorney performed deficiently when he advised a defendant to plead guilty but, because of a failure to conduct reasonable legal research, did not advise the defendant of a plausible affirmative defense
  • construing the affirmative justification defense very narrowly when it comes to felon in possession of firearm cases
  • emphasizing * Lewis’ cousin was killed in the altercation. 3 that “we . . . construe the justification defense for possession of a firearm by a felon very narrowly” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding the justification defense to be potentially available 5 where the defendant took the weapon from a third party with known violent tendencies who 6 allegedly put a loaded firearm to the defendant’s head
  • found a justification defense exists under predecessor statute to 18 U.S.C. § 922

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Niemeyer, Gregory, Norton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.