Skip to main content
· 12/3/2003

United States v. Montoan-Herrera

Citations

  • 351 F.3d 462
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 24325
  • 2003 WL 22854651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting that in those cases where we did not require further findings, the requisite act had been done, in that “the district court specifically found defendant was entitled to an adjustment”
  • “The district court did not state what the adjustment was for nor did it make a finding that the requirements for the adjustment were satisfied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Henry, Baldock, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.