United States v. Mondragon Farias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “air freshener[s] coupled with other indicia of criminal activity supports a reasonable brief inquiry for purposes of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)”
• concluding detention of defendant after a lawful stop was illegal because Sergeant Mangelson kept defendant longer than necessary while asking questions unrelated to the alleged reason for the stop in pursuit of “a hunch”
• concluding detention of defendant after a lawful stop was illegal because Sergeant Mangelson kept defendant longer than necessary while asking questions unrelated to the alleged reason for the stop in pursuit of “a hunch”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).