Skip to main content
· 2/14/2003

United States v. Molina-Marrero

Citations

  • 320 F.3d 64
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2734
  • 2003 WL 329017

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the district court's reliance on facts alleged in a PSR to enhance the defendant's sentence did not violate due process because the defendant had access and could object to the PSR

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Coffin, Campbell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.