· 2/14/2003
United States v. Molina-Marrero
Citations
- 320 F.3d 64
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 2734
- 2003 WL 329017
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the district court's reliance on facts alleged in a PSR to enhance the defendant's sentence did not violate due process because the defendant had access and could object to the PSR
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Coffin, Campbell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.