United States v. Molina-Chacon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that suit against a defendant in his individual capacity is sufficient to preclude the plaintiff from asserting a Corum claim against the defendant in his official capacity
• holding that there was material dispute of fact as to whether an officer reasonably believed bystanders were in imminent danger when the officer “admitted she was unsure where other officers were positioned” at the time she fired
• holding that a claim against defendant in his official capacity is sufficient to preclude plaintiff from asserting a Corum claim against the defendant in his official capacity
• holding that a claim against defendant in his individual capacity is sufficient to preclude plaintiff from asserting North Carolina Constitutional claim against the defendant in his official capacity
• noting that “this Court has previously held that a plaintiff must separately allege the exceptions to public official immunity”
• noting that “this Court has previously held that a plaintiff must separately allege the exceptions to public official immunity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).