United States v. Mohammed Y. Aminy, Also Known as Mohammed Yousf Aminy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that sufficient similarity, not “synonymity,” is required to establish the relevance of pri- or similar bad acts
• “Where, for example, the defendant does not deny that he was present during a narcotics transaction but simply denies wrongdoing, evidence of other arguably similar narcotics involvement may, in appropriate circumstances, be admitted to show knowledge or intent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).