United States v. Mohammed Ali Nonahal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Rule 32.1 does not require a hearing when a district court refuses to modify conditions
• holding that Rule 32.1(c) does not require a hearing when a district court refuses to modify conditions
• finding Rule 32.1(c) “does not compel the court to hold a hearing before refusing a request for modification.”
• affirming denial of request to move while on supervised release, though district court gave no explanation for its denial of original motion or motion for reconsideration
• “the rule does not compel the court to hold a hearing before refusing a request for modification”
• “[R]emand is un- necessary because the district court’s reasons … are appar- ent.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).