United States v. M.L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because a variety of programs were available for the treatment of the defendant as a juvenile that the sixth factor weighed “slightly in favor” of juvenile treatment
• holding that juvenile’s lack of a juvenile record “weighs in favor of treating him as a juvenile, since it increases the likelihood “that he can be rehabilitated by the time he reaches age 21.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).