Skip to main content
· 4/22/1988

United States v. M.K. Fadel

Citations

  • 844 F.2d 1425
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 5367
  • 1988 WL 35245

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “in rebutting an entrapment defense, the government is not required to show that the defendant has engaged in prior acts or violations of the narcotics laws”
  • “The vast majority of courts which have considered the issue have not favored the pretrial resolution of entrapment defense motions.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Seymour, Moore, Phillips

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.