· 6/19/2013
United States v. Mitchell Smalls
Citations
- 720 F.3d 193
- 2013 WL 3037658
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12476
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “in failing to consider a reply brief, the district court did not fail to consider all relevant [arguments] properly before it”
- “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”
- “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”
- “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the court’s discretion.”
- “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the court’s discretion.”
- “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motz, Gregory, Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.