Skip to main content
· 6/19/2013

United States v. Mitchell Smalls

Citations

  • 720 F.3d 193
  • 2013 WL 3037658
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 12476

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “in failing to consider a reply brief, the district court did not fail to consider all relevant [arguments] properly before it”
  • “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”
  • “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”
  • “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the court’s discretion.”
  • “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the court’s discretion.”
  • “Whether to reduce a sentence and to what extent is a matter within the district court’s discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, Gregory, Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.