United States v. Mitchell, Dennis L.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “Rule 22(b) [of Federal Appellate Procedure] requires initial application in the district court for a COA”
• holding that suspension of an attorney does not, by itself, render counsel per se ineffective under the Sixth Amendment, and that the Strickland analysis still applies
• holding that suspension of an attorney does not, by itself, render counsel per se ineffective under the Sixth Amendment, and that the Strickland analysis still applies
• “[T]he district court should rule in the first instance on whether a COA should be issued.” (citing Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)
• \[T]he district court should rule in the first instance on whether a COA should be issued\ (citing Fed. R. App. P. 22(b)
• “Rule 22(b) requires initial application in the district court for a COA before the court of appeals acts on a COA request.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).