United States v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]f appellant did not receive the benefit of the bargained-for pretrial agreement, the pleas would be treated as improvident, the findings would be set aside and he would be subject to retrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Perron
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2003-02-12· cited 68×
• United States v. Smead
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2009-07-27· cited 50×
• United States v. Smith
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-01-30· cited 50×
• United States v. Williams
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-08-20· cited 35×
• United States v. Williams
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-08-18· cited 32×
• United States v. Hardcastle
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2000-08-18· cited 30×
• United States v. Lundy
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2004-06-24· cited 15×
• United States v. Perron
  U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2000-08-28· cited 7×
• United States v. Molina
  U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2009-09-09· cited 6×
• United States v. Perron
  U S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals· 2001-11-01· cited 4×
• United States v. Juarez
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2001-05-14· cited 1×
• United States v. Thomas
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-10-26
• United States v. COLLETTI
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2024-05-09

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• United States v. Olson
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1987-12-14· cited 33×