United States v. Mitchell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding it “unfathomable” that a provision of the Uniform Commercial Code could have any relevance in a criminal proceeding
• denying defendants’ pro se motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction
• describing “flesh and blood defense” and its anti-government roots
• summarizing history of “sovereign citizen” legal theories
• summarizing history of “sovereign citizen” legal theories
• summarizing history of “sovereign citizen” legal theories

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Denard Neal
  Ninth Circuit· 2015-01-12· cited 92×
• Lewis v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2016-01-07· cited 26×
• State v. Matthews
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22· cited 20×
• State v. Farley
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-16· cited 8×
• Furr v. Ruehlman
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-02-21· cited 8×
• Cubar v. Town & Country Bank & Trust Co.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2015-08-28· cited 6×
• Bourdon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2016-03-18· cited 3×
• Richmond v. Wampanoag Tribal Court Cases
  D. Utah· 2006-04-21· cited 2×
• Jeffrey Hout v. State of Alaska, Office of the Governor, and Governor Mike Dunleavy, in an Official Capacity
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2023-11-17· cited 2×
• State v. Smith
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-02
• Walker v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-03-11