United States v. Mirama Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a letter regarding a consumer complaint from the CPSC to a manufacturer may actually trigger the reporting requirement, because ”[w]hen a consumer contacts the Commission, the consumer may not communicate the same information that is communicated to the company”
• “Companies should report as soon as they have 26 information which ‘reasonably supports’ the conclusion that the 27 product contains a reportable defect . . .”
• “The Court does not require expert testimony to find that a reasonable person could 20 conclude that the juicer contained a defect, either in the actual unit or in the accompanying 21 instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).