United States v. Minkow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a plaintiff who “is not a lawyer . . . is not expected to have a full legal comprehension of all [his] claims”
• “Suits brought under the FDCPA such as this case regularly satisfy the superiority 18 requirement of Rule 23.”
• plaintiff who understood the allegations in the complaint, reviewed the complaint prior to filing, and understood her “duties as a class representative and the need to observe the best interests of those she represents” was adequate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).