Skip to main content
· 9/15/1873

United States v. Milwaukee & St. P. Ry. Co.

Citations

  • 26 F. Cas. 1265
  • 5 Biss. 420

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that because statements were “brief and isolated”, their admission constituted harmless error
  • refusing to reverse because the prosecutor’s comments constituted harmless error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hopkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.