Skip to main content
· 7/17/2001

United States v. Milton M. Dowell, Appeal Of: Donald v. Morano

Citations

  • 257 F.3d 694
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 15922
  • 2001 WL 800042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that contempt is an appropriate action when a party \violate[s] an order that sets forth in specific detail an unequivocal command from the court\
  • explaining that contempt is an appropri- ate action when a party “violate[s] an order that sets forth in specific detail an unequivocal command from the court”
  • explaining that, although fines payable to the court are typically criminal contempt sanctions, such fines constitute civil contempt sanctions when purpose of fine is to compensate the court when the court, in effect, is the injured complainant
  • “To be held in civil contempt, [the defendant] must have violated an order that sets forth in specific detail an unequivocal command from the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Bauer, Posner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.