United States v. Milo Farris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant cannot demand, on the basis of due process, “a sentence that comports with the Sixth Amendment requirements of Booker, but ... avoid[ ] the possibility of a higher sentence under the remedial holding of Booker ” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• noting that a defendant cannot demand, on the basis of due process, “a sentence that comports with the Sixth Amendment requirements of Booker, but . . . avoid[] the possibility of a higher sentence under the remedial holding of Booker” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “By recommending his participation in . . . mental health counseling, the court appreciated the need for a sentence that provided Farris with appropriate correctional treatment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).