United States v. Mills, Duflot & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five-year period between crime and identification and lack of accurate description were outweighed by strong indi-cia of reliability
• holding that: “By blindly adopting the magistrate judge’s findings, apparently without ever having received a report and recommendation, the district court violated § 636(b)(1).”
• refusing to apply appellate waiver rule where - 29 - defendant made only a general objection, because neither magistrate judge nor district court made copy of report available to defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).