United States v. Millet

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding a district court’s decision to instruct the jury on entrapment related to a gun charge, while refusing an entrapment instruction pertaining to related drug charges
• upholding a district court’s decision to instruct the jury on entrapment related to a gun charge, while refusing an entrapment instruction pertaining to related drug charges
• finding district court did not clearly err in determining that defendant was a leader in the drug conspiracy where, inter alia, he was a conduit of information
• finding no procedural error where “it [was] evident that the court considered several of the § 3553(a) factors in arriving at [the defendant’s] sentence,” even though the court did not list the factors
• finding no procedural error where “it [was] evident that the court considered several of the § 3553(a) factors in arriving at [the defendant’s] sentence,” even though the court did not list the factors
• district court provided adequate discussion of reasons for sen- 8 No. 09-2862 tence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).