United States v. Millard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “an appellant [must] raise an issue in his opening brief or else waive the issue on appeal”
• holding “an appellant [must] raise an issue in his opening brief or else waive the issue on appeal”
• noting that an error is harmless if this Court can “conclude ‘with fair assurance . . . that the judgment was not substantially swayed by the error’ ” (quoting Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765, 66 S. Ct. 1239, 90 L. Ed. 1557 (1946))
• “[I]ssues raised in a notice of appeal but not argued in an appellant’s brief are waived.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).