United States v. Milano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a signature requirement made it more likely that plaintiffs would have “a more narrow choice of delegates pledged to the various presidential candidates” “if [plaintiffs’] statistical arguments are credited”
• “The plaintiffs point to a disparity between districts with many Republicans and districts with few Republicans.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).