United States v. Mija S. Romer, United States of America v. Khem C. Batra

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when a court evaluates the sufficiency UNITED STATES v. CARGILL 33 of the evidence, it does not review the credibility of the witnesses, and it assumes that the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the government
• stating that credibility determinations and weighing of the evidence are for the jury
• stating that credibility determinations and weighing of the evi- dence are for the jury
• abrogated on other grounds by United States v. Strassini , 59 F. App'x 550 (4th Cir. 2003)
• article admitted to illuminate conversation in which defendants referred to and discussed article
• “[W]e are not entitled to weigh the evidence or to assess the credibility of witnesses, but must assume that the jury resolved all contradictions ... in favor of the Government.” (citations and internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).