· 2/10/1995
United States v. Miguel Soto and Luisa Cespedes, Pedro Pena Also Known as Johnny
Citations
- 47 F.3d 546
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 2738
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining to infer that court had considered defendant's ability to pay from district court's decision not to impose a fine, where the court made no statement that it declined to fine because defendant was unable to pay both restitution and fine
- declining to infer that court had considered defendant’s ability to pay from district court’s decision not to impose a fine, where the court made no statement that it declined to fine because defendant was unable to pay both restitution and fine
- “[T]he record must demonstrate that the court has considered [the mandatory] factors in ordering restitution.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Oakes, Altimari, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.