United States v. Miguel Matias, Sr., Jose Caraballo, Miguel Matias, Jr., Frankie Matias, Luis Garcia, Miguel Matias, Sr., and Jose Caraballo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to employ the \drastic remedy\ oF.Supp.ression of all evidence seized because the \normal remedy\ oF.Supp.ressing and returning only the items seized outside the scope of warrant was more appropriate
• “[W]hen items outside the scope of a valid warrant are seized, the normal remedy is suppression and return of those items . . . .”
• blanket suppression inappropriate because \the documents and photographs that are the foundation for the claim of an unconstitutional wholesale search were properly seized under the authority of the warrant\
• “A search must be confined to the terms and limitations of the warrant authorizing it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).