United States v. Miguel Doningo Gregory

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that 22-month delay was not sufficiently long to excuse the defendant from demonstrating actual prejudice
• holding that a 22-month delay attributable to government negligence “is not long enough to excuse [the defendant] from demonstrating actual prejudice to prevail on his claim”
• holding that an individual asserting a 5 due process violation based on a 22-month delay attributable to the government’s 6 negligence was not excused from showing actual prejudice
• holding that a 22-month delay did not excuse the defendant from demonstrating actual prejudice
• holding that “[t]he prejudice with which we are concerned is prejudice caused by the delay that triggered the Barker inquiry, not simply any prejudice that may have occurred before the trial date but unrelated to the fact of the delay itself”
• recognizing a “general consensus” among the circuits that “eight months constitutes the threshold minimum”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).