United States v. Miguel De La Torre-Jimenez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the phrase “as charged in the Information (or Indictment)” is not necessary where the documents are unambiguous
• “[O]ur precedent squarely forecloses the argument that . . . the phrase ‘as charged in the Information (or Indictment)’ is not required where the documents are unambiguous.”
• “Where the minute order . . . specifies that a defendant pleaded guilty to a particular count of a criminal complaint, the court may consider the 2 facts alleged in the complaint. . . .”
• the phrase “as charged in the Information (or Indictment
• the phrase “as charged in the Information (or Indictment
• applying the modified categorical approach to a divisible statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).