Skip to main content
· 2/20/2003

United States v. Miguel Arnaldo Delgado, Deepak Kumar

Citations

  • 321 F.3d 1338
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 943
  • 91 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1045
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 3161
  • 2003 WL 360265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “rare exceptions to this [Summerlin] rule” apply only in civil cases and “ha[ve] never been applied in a criminal context”
  • “Contrary to what Delgado claims, the jury had sufficient evidence to find him guilty of the conspiracy.”
  • \This principle protects public rights vested in the government for the benefit of all from the inadvertence of the agents upon which the government must necessarily rely.\
  • “[I]t is well settled that the United States is not bound by state statutes of limitation or subject to the defense of laches in enforcing its rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Mills, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.