United States v. Miguel Angel Morales-Sosa, Also Known as La Mueneca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Johnson substantial rights standard, and highlighting defendant’s failure to allege that he would not have plead guilty as evidence of failure to meet Johnson standard
• “Sosa has never alleged that full compliance with Rule 11 would have affected his decision to plead guilty, nor does the record support such a suggestion.”
• “Sosa has never alleged that full compliance with Rule 11 would have affected his decision to plead guilty, nor does the record support such a suggestion.”
• “Sosa has never alleged that full compliance with Rule 11 would have affected his decision to plead guilty, nor does the record support such a suggestion.”
• “We are also persuaded by the government's argument that the district court did in fact implicitly accept the plea agreement. Had the district court rejected Sosa's agreement, the court would have been required, under Rule 11(e)(4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).