United States v. Miguel Alfonso Quintana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denial of right to allocute was not prejudicial because district court sentenced defendant to low end of guideline range
• holding, in a pre-Booker denial of allocution case, that reversal was inappropriate because the defendant was sentenced to the bottom of the range, which was the lowest term of imprisonment permissible under the guidelines
• equating manifest injustice with the plain error standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).