United States v. Midwest Suspension and Brake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a party must act with due diligence if it intends to take advantage of [Rule 15’s] liberality”
• \Midwest's argument that the district court did not establish any nexus whatsoever between the violations claimed and the penalties assessed has no merit.\
• “Midwest’s argument that the district court did not establish any nexus whatsoever between the violations claimed and the penalties assessed has no merit.”
• “Although Rule 15(a) indicates that leave to amend shall be freely granted, a party must act with due diligence if it intends to take advantage of the Rule’s liberality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).