United States v. Michael Xavier Rigby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court made adequate findings when it stated that the position in the Probation Officer’s addendum was the correct one
• concluding the district court “clearly explained the basis for its ruling, finding that the presentence report and addendum were correct”
• stating that clarification of the district court's findings was not required because the defendant \was given full opportunity to request a more definitive ruling and did not do so\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).