· 12/6/1995
United States v. Michael Thomas Martin
Citations
- 72 F.3d 130
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 39771
- 1995 WL 723193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appellate court found that district court improperly construed petitioner’s letter requesting a concurrent sentence to be a motion to correct sentence under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36; appellate court found letter to be a § 2255 motion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.