Skip to main content
· 5/9/2006

United States v. Michael Spano, Sr., Emil Schullo, and James Inendino

Citations

  • 447 F.3d 517
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 11458
  • 2006 WL 1230331

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A refusal or failure to exercise the discretion afforded by Booker (or our inability to determine whether discretion was actually No. 05-2996 13 exercised) would require a [ ] remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Kanne, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.