Skip to main content
· 10/30/1991

United States v. Michael Rudolph Cruz

Citations

  • 946 F.2d 122
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 25533
  • 1991 WL 205246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a) places the burden of proof on the defendant to show acceptance of responsibility
  • noting a “technical viola- tion of Jones” where the district court’s failure to elicit objections did not affect our ability to provide meaningful appellate review because the defendant had raised and preserved the issues on ap- peal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fay, Hatchett, Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.