United States v. Michael Robert Laykin, United States of America v. Dennis Lee Crain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing, in a federal criminal case, a variance between the date of conspiracy charged in the indictment and the proof at trial
• describing as adequate notice an indictment that was uncertain as to time but alleged clear overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy
• requiring only that the defendants had adequate notice of the charges against them
• holding error harmless where limiting instruction was provided
• 18 specific facts alleged in the indictment were sufficient to limit the time frame
• no prejudice from four month variance in conspiracy's starting date

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).