United States v. Michael R. Kathman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding 61% downward variance based on assessment that defendant was \a law abiding fine young man\ who merely used \poor judgment\ one evening and was less culpable than similar defendants
• upholding 61% downward variance based on assessment that defendant was “a law abiding fine young man” who merely used “poor judgment” one evening and was less culpable than similar defendants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).