United States v. Michael Paul Maiello, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Amendment 788 made Amendment 782 retroactive, though district courts were only authorized to grant such retroactive relief beginning on No- vember 1, 2015
• stating that a court may modify a final sentence only when one of the limited exceptions in § 3582(c) applies
• holding that Tapia does not apply to section 3582(c)(2)
• discussing the history of Amendments 782, 788
• discussing Sentencing Commission’s decision on retroactivity
• discussing adoption of Amendment 782

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).